Examines stress associations with disordered eating and intuitive eating, indicating differences by generation status.
Objective: Examine associations of stress indicators with disordered eating attitudes and behaviors (DEABs) and intuitive eating (IE), and whether these differ between first-generation (FGCS) and continuing-generation college students (CGCS). Participants: College students (N = 890; 41.6% FGCS). Methods: Generation-status-stratified modified Poisson regressions and linear regressions examined associations of perceived stress, stress management, and unmanaged stress with DEABs and IE. Results: Among FGCS, high perceived stress was associated with unhealthy weight control behaviors (PR = 1.33) and body weight/shape concerns (PR = 1.39); poor stress management was associated with binge-eating symptoms (PR = 1.39) and lower IE (β=-1.45); unmanaged stress was associated with binge eating (PR = 1.48) and lower IE (β=-1.11). Among CGCS, perceived stress, poor stress management, and unmanaged stress were associated with binge-eating symptoms (PRs = 1.45–1.68), and lower IE (β=-0.66 to −1.18). Conclusions: Associations between stress and eating behaviors suggested differences by college-going generation status. Future research is needed to clarify potential subgroup heterogeneity and underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yoon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: