Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates emotion recognition effects on mentalizing and bias in ingroup versus outgroup faces.
Mentalizing-inferring others' mental states-is a core social function supported by both perceptual and contextual processes. Emotion recognition similarly unfolds in two stages: early perceptual decoding of facial features followed by context-sensitive interpretation. Here, we tested whether emotion recognition scaffolds mentalizing across these stages and whether they attenuate or amplify social bias. Participants (N = 34) completed a face categorization task during EEG recording, in which mentalizing was operationalized as differential neural responses to mindful (human) versus mindless (doll-like) faces, while perceptual (neutral vs. smiling) and contextual (ingroup vs. outgroup) cues were systematically manipulated. Early neural responses differentiated human from doll-like faces, indicating rapid mind detection despite perceptual similarity. Smiling expressions enhanced early neural sensitivity across both human and doll-like faces, suggesting that emotional information is extracted at early perceptual stages independently of stimulus humanity. Later EEG components revealed an asymmetry: emotional expressions selectively boosted mental state attribution for ingroup faces, reflecting the integration of contextual social information at later stages. Implicit association tests confirmed this pattern, with mind-related concepts more strongly associated with smiling ingroup faces.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biasiotti et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: