This research looks at how effective the Agriculture Produce Market Committee (APMC) is and the problems farmers face when joining the Electronic National Agriculture Market (e-NAM) in India. The study shows that APMC has done some good things for local farmers, like helping with fair prices, getting access to markets, and making things more transparent. However, not all farmers feel the same. Some say they get fair prices and good market access, while others worry about prices being unfairly set and having trouble reaching more buyers. Many farmers also feel there isn't enough transparency in how things are done and not enough information shared with them. The research also talks about the difficulties farmers have in using e-NAM. These include not having good access to digital tools, not knowing how to use technology, not being aware of the system, complicated registration steps, and trouble using the online trading platform. Farmers have high hopes for APMCs to give them fair prices, and they want clearer ways to find out prices, stop middlemen from taking advantage, and get fair pay. The study concludes that farmers expect APMCs to make sure prices are fair and competitive, offer good storage and transport, protect them from unfair middlemen, help them get credit, and share market information. It also mentions that being open and communicating better with farmers, along with teaching them about e-NAM and technology, is key to solving their problems and improving their lives.
Miss. Kharnar B. R. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: