Demonstrates efficient gas capture and particulate matter filtration using polymer membranes, suggesting a new recovery method.
Simultaneously addressing rising carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) concentrations and aerosol particulate pollution remains a significant challenge for public health and the environment. Integrating CO 2 -adsorbing porous organic polymers (POPs) into a scalable membrane offers a promising pathway to multifunctional materials capable of simultaneous gas separation and aerosol filtration. Herein, amide-functionalized POPs with high porosity and active amide sites were prepared through a solvothermal-assisted ammonium carboxylate salt method. The optimized amide POP (Am-POP) exhibited high separation selectivity towards CO 2 /N 2 (32) and C 2 H 2 /CO 2 (3), consistent with Q st values of 39 kJ mol -1 (C 2 H 2 ) and 31 kJ mol -1 (CO 2 ), indicating stronger interaction with C 2 H 2 than CO 2 . After incorporation into a cellulose acetate (CA) matrix, the Am-POP/CA membrane achieved a PM 2.5 filtration efficiency of 99% at a low basis weight of 0.5 g m -2 with 30 Pa pressure drop. Increasing the basis weight to 2.5 g m -2 further improved the filtration efficiency to 99.99%. Also, the intrinsic chemical stability of Am-POP enabled matrix-sacrificial recovery of the active POP adsorbent from the used membrane via acid treatment. The Am-POP sorbent recovery efficiency was 98%, 96%, 93%, and 65% after the 1 st , 3 rd , 5 th , and 10 th recovery cycles, respectively. A detailed membrane performance evaluation was conducted primarily for the first five cycles, highlighting both the potential and remaining challenges of the matrix-sacrificial adsorbent-recovery filtration membrane. This work establishes a viable matrix-sacrificial sorbent recovery strategy for developing multifunctional POP-based membranes, enabling partial sorbent recovery and reprocessing of the active sorbent into reconstructed membranes for gas adsorption and PM 2.5 filtration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lakshmanan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: