Key result
Acute intravenous administration of folic acid during a 25-minute ischemic period reduced infarct size by 45% in young, healthy rats anesthetized with pentobarbital, but offered no protection in aged or pre-diabetic rats, or under fentanyl-propofol anesthesia.
Why the study?
Does high-dose folic acid reduce infarct size in animal models of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury?
Does high-dose folic acid reduce infarct size in animal models of cardiac ischemia/reperfusion injury?
Effect estimate: 45% reduction
Absolute Event Rate: 40.6% vs 74.2%
p-value: p=<0.05
The cardioprotective efficacy of high-dose folic acid against ischemia/reperfusion injury is highly dependent on experimental conditions, highlighting the need for rigorous preclinical testing in clinically relevant models to prevent translational failure.
Folic acid protection is highly condition-specific in rats; leaves open translation to human ischemia/reperfusion injury pending relevant models.
BACKGROUND: Acute, high-dose folic acid (FA) administration has recently been shown to possess unprecedented effective cardioprotection against ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Here we explore the translation potential of FA as treatment modality for cardiac I/R. METHODS: Dependency of FA protection on dose, ischaemia duration, and eNOS was examined in an isolated mouse heart I/R model, whereas dependency on animal health status and anaesthesia was examined in an in vivo rat model of regional cardiac I/R. RESULTS: 50 μM FA provided maximal reduction (by 95%) of I/R-induced cell death following 25 min ischaemia in isolated wild-type hearts, with protection associated with increased coupled eNOS protein. No protection was observed with 35 min I or in eNOS(-/-) hearts. Acute intravenous administration of FA during a 25 min ischaemic period reduced infarct size by 45% in in vivo pentobarbital-anaesthetised young, healthy rats. FA did not reduce infarct size in aged or pre-diabetic rats, although it did preserve hemodynamics in the pre-diabetic rats. Finally, using a clinically-relevant anaesthetic regimen of fentanyl-propofol anaesthesia, FA treatment was ineffective in young, aged and pre-diabetic animals. CONCLUSIONS: The protective potential of an initially promising cardioprotective treatment of high dose FA against cardiac I/R infarction, is critically dependent on experimental conditions with relevance to the clinical condition. Our data indicates the necessity of expanded pre-clinical testing of cardioprotective interventions before embarking on clinical testing, in order to prevent too many "lost-in-translation" drugs and unnecessary clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuurbier et al. (2014) studied Cardiac ischaemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Folic acid vs. Saline or no folic acid was evaluated on Infarct size as a percentage of area at risk (in vivo young rats under pentobarbital) (45% reduction, p=<0.05). Acute intravenous administration of folic acid during a 25-minute ischemic period reduced infarct size by 45% in young, healthy rats anesthetized with pentobarbital, but offered no protection in aged or pre-diabetic rats, or under fentanyl-propofol anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: