We have searched for high-redshift supernova (SN) candidates in multiple deep Hubble Space Telescope (HST) archival images of nine galaxy cluster fields. We detect six apparent SNe, with 21:6 < I 814 < 28:4 mag. There is roughly 1 SN per deep I 814 . 26 mag, doublyimaged WFPC2 cluster field. Two SNe are associated with cluster galaxies (at redshifts z 0:18 and z 0:83, three are probably in galaxies not in the clusters (at z 0:49, z 0:60, and z 0:98, and one is at unknown z. After accounting for observational efficiencies and uncertainties (statistical and systematic) we derive the rate of type Ia SNe within the projected central 500 h 21 50 kpc of rich clusters: R 0:20 0:84 20:19 h 2 50 SNu in 0:18 < z < 0:37 clusters, and R 0:41 1:23 20:39 h 2 50 SNu in clusters at 0:83 < z < 1:27 (95 per cent confidence interval; 1 SNu ; 1 SN century 21 per 10 10 L B( ). Combining the two redshift bins, the mean rate is R z0:41 0:30 0:58 20:28 h 2 50 SNu. The upper bounds argue against SNe Ia being the dominant source of the large iron mass observed in the intracluster medium. We also compare our observed counts of field SNe (i.e. non-cluster SNe of all types) to recent model predictions. The observed field count is N < 1 SN with I 814 < 26 mag, and 1 < N < 3 SNe with I 814 < 27 mag. These counts are half of some of the predictions. Since the counts at these magnitudes are likely dominated by type II SNe, our observations may suggest obscuration of distant SNe II, or a SN II luminosity distribution devoid of a large highluminosity tail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gal‐Yam et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: