Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dynamic prioritization framework identifies shifting ecological priorities in response to climate and land-use changes.
Climate and land-use change are reshaping habitat suitability and landscapes governing structural connectivity, yet most connectivity assessments remain static, assuming fixed ranges and time-invariant resistance. Here we develop a dynamic prioritization framework that integrates climate suitability, land-use change and network prioritization to generate time-explicit corridor priorities for four major taxonomic groups, Amphibia, Aves, Mammalia and Plantae, across mainland China. Comparing static and time-updated corridor strategies under climate-only, human-only and combined resistance settings, we find pervasive turnover in core areas and shifting corridor priorities through time. Single-dimension resistance models consistently increase exposure to the omitted complementary stressor, whereas time-updated corridors reduce long-horizon exposure relative to static assumptions, with climate dynamics contributing more strongly than land-use dynamics. Overall, static and single-dimension connectivity models can underestimate long-term exposure and misidentify persistent priorities. Our framework provides a transferable template for spatiotemporal connectivity prioritization under climate and land-use change. Dynamic connectivity framework with time-evolving corridor strategies shows pervasive turnover in core areas and shifting corridor priorities through time in a proof-of-concept corridor priorities experiment for four major taxonomic groups, whereas static and single-dimension models underestimate long-term exposure
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: