Numerical study shows enhanced cooling effectiveness in microchannels using vortex generators and nanofluids, indicating potential for better heat transfer solutions.
Enhancing heat transfer in microchannel cooling systems requires a careful balance between flow disturbance and hydraulic penalty. This numerical study examines the combined effects of active vortex excitation and nanofluid addition in a locally heated microchannel. An oscillating circular vortex generator is employed, and an Al₂O₃-water nanofluid is modeled using Buongiorno’s two-phase formulation. The influences of oscillation amplitude ratio ( A ) and nanofluid volume fraction (NVF, φ ) on flow structure, thermal efficiency (Φ T ), mechanical penalty (Φ M ), and the resulting thermal performance factor (TPF) are examined. The results show that active vortex generates sustained vortical structures that effectively disrupt the thermal boundary layer, leading to a pronounced increase in Φ T compared with both the pure channel (No VG) and fixed vortex generator (Fixed VG). Increasing the oscillation amplitude ratio enhances Φ T , but also raises Φ M . At φ = 0.0%, the TPF ranking varies with amplitude, with No VG yielding the highest TPF at A ≤ 0.3, followed by Active VG and Fixed VG, while at A ≥ 0.3 the Active VG provides the best overall performance. The introduction of nanofluids further amplifies thermal performance, with a maximum Φ T enhancement of 60.60% observed at φ = 6.0%. When combined with active vortex excitation, the overall TPF is improved relative to the No VG case, with the highest value observed at A = 0.4 and φ = 5.4%. These findings confirm that active vortex control dominates heat transfer enhancement, while nanofluids provide an additional performance margin when appropriately coupled with oscillatory flow modulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: