Philosophical paper argues that affective forecasting prescribes emotions, affecting decision-making implications.
Affective forecasting is the mental action of predicting what kind of emotional state we will be in at some future time. Affective forecasting plays a crucial role in our decision-making, emotion regulation and in our life in general. This paper is about the direction of fit of affective forecasting. I argue that affective forecasting, unlike other forecasts, for example, the weather forecast, does not have a mind-to-world, but rather a world-to-mind direction of fit: it prescribes, not describes. The consequences of this way of thinking about affective forecasting are considered for philosophical questions about decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bence Nánay (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: