Retrospective multicenter study evaluates mirikizumab effectiveness and safety in ulcerative colitis, showing significant clinical improvements.
Background & Aims Mirikizumab, an IL-23 p19–targeting monoclonal antibody, is approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Real-world evidence on its effectiveness and safety remains limited. We evaluated its effectiveness and safety in a real-world setting. Methods This retrospective multicenter study included adult UC patients treated with mirikizumab at 5 Italian centers (June 2024-October 2025), with ≥24 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome was clinical remission (CR, pMS ≤ 2 with rectal bleeding 0) at week(w)12. Secondary outcomes included intestinal ultrasound (IUS) remission, endoscopic remission, bowel urgency (BU) remission, fecal calprotectin (FC) normalization, and safety profile. Results A total of 236 patients (60.2% male; median age 47) were included. 77.5% had prior exposure to advanced therapy. Mirikizumab significantly reduced pMS at w12 and w24 (both P < .001), with clinical remission in 46.6% and 55.5%, respectively. Mayo endoscopic score improved at both timepoints (P < .01 and P < .001) with 38% achieving endoscopic remission at w24. IUS remission was nonsignificant at w12 but significant at w24 (P < .0001). BU and FC improved at both timepoints (P < .001). Remission rates were similar in biologic-naive and biologic-exposed patients. Discontinuations were uncommon, adverse events were infrequent and non-serious, and liver tests showed no clinically relevant changes. Conclusions In this real-world multicenter cohort, mirikizumab was associated with meaningful improvements across clinical, endoscopic, biochemical, and ultrasound outcomes, with low discontinuation rates and a favorable safety profile through 24 weeks. These findings support the effectiveness of selective IL-23 inhibition in routine care, including in patients with prior exposure to advanced therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Amico et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: