Study developed new montelukast derivatives to improve visual function in diabetic mice, highlighting treatment potential.
Introduction and Objective: Early-stage diabetic retinopathy (DR) is characterized by vascular endothelial cell damage and breakdown of the blood-retinal barrier. We and others previously shown that CysLTR1 antagonist Montelukast (MON) is a promising treatment for diabetes-related eye issues. This study aims to develop and assess the effectiveness of new MON derivatives in alleviating endothelial dysfunction and subsequent neurodegeneration in diabetic mice. Methods: Two analogs (MA-01 & MA-02) were synthesized. In silico docking with CysLTR1 was performed. Solubility and cytotoxicity were evaluated. Human retinal microvascular endothelial cells (HREC) treated with 20 ng/mL TNF-α and 30 mM D-glucose (30 mM L-glucose as control) were analyzed for inflammation, autophagy and vascular leakage, with and without analog treatment. Owing to the superior efficacy of MA-01, further in-vivo studies were performed for visual function in 8-week-old streptozotocin induced diabetic mouse model over three months. Results: In silico, analogs exhibited higher CysLTR1 receptor binding affinity than MON and showed good solubility in DMSO/water. Cell viability assays indicated MA-01 and MON are tolerable up to 5 µM, while MA-02 is tolerable up to 10 µM. HREC cells exposed to D-glucose+TNF-α and pre-treated with MA-01 or MA-02 (5 µM) showed significant reductions in IL1β, CXCL10, VCAM1, and CCL2 levels. MA-01 and MA-02 improved transendothelial resistance versus D-glucose+TNF-α and inhibited leukocyte transmigration, reducing endothelial permeability. In diabetic mice, MA-01 provided sustained neuroprotection over three months. Conclusion: The novel derivatives of MON effectively reduce inflammation-driven effects in HREC. In-vivo studies confirmed that MA-01 protects against diabetes-induced visual impairments. Our preliminary research has established a strong foundation for MON analogs as promising treatments for DR-associated endothelial dysfunction. Future studies will compare systemic versus local intravitreal delivery and potential neurobehavioral complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
SEETHARAMAN et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: