Retrospective cohort analysis evaluates lymph node metrics' impact on survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, suggesting crucial prognostic roles.
Objectives We evaluated the prognostic impact of lymph node yield (LNY) and lymph node ratio (LNR) on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods Using a retrospective cohort of 214 patients who had undergone surgical resection between 2000 and 2022), LNY was dichotomized at the median (≤13 vs >13 nodes). The LNR was categorized as 0, 0.01 to 0.20, and greater than 0.20. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier/log rank and multivariable Cox regression; node-negative category (N0) sensitivity analyses were performed. Results The LNY was not significantly associated with differences in DFS (14 vs 15 months; P = .72) or OS (18 vs 26 months; P = .27), although N0 patients showed a trend toward longer OS with higher LNY (22 vs 36 months; P = .087). The LNR statistically significantly separated DFS (19 vs 10 vs 12 months; P = .003) and OS (28 vs 20 vs 18 months; P = .045). In Cox models, an LNY below 13 was protective for DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.633; P = .03) and borderline for OS (HR, 0.705; P = .07). Compared with an LNR of 0, an LNR of 0.01 to 0.20 or greater than 0.20 independently predicted recurrence (HR, 1.921; P = .006 and HR, 1.745; P = .02); for OS, only an LNR greater than 0.20 remained significant (HR, 1.752; P = .01). A higher LNR was associated with lymphovascular/perineural invasion and progression. Conclusions Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic marker after resection that predicts recurrence and—when above 0.20—mortality, whereas LNY mainly reflects staging adequacy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gallardo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: