What question did this study set out to answer?

This framework aims to explore how memory retrieval is influenced by different sensory pathways under specific contexts.

June 9, 2026Open Access

Three-Domain Sensory Socket Model of Memory v1.7: A Retrieval-Dominance Structural Hypothesis

Q: What does this research mean for the field?

Memory retrieval is structurally organized through three dominant sensory routes—auditory, olfactory, and visual—that preferentially trigger access to memory resources under specific contexts. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.METHODOLOGICAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

Key Points

This framework aims to explore how memory retrieval is influenced by different sensory pathways under specific contexts.
Proposes a static retrieval-dominance architecture with defined audit boundaries and operationalisation requirements.
Outlines conditions for falsifiability and non-circularity in the memory retrieval process.
Describes three sensory socket routes (auditory, olfactory, visual) that may dominate memory retrieval access.
Clarifies the limitations, indicating it does not attempt to create a complete memory theory or classify individuals.

Abstract

This record contains the final Concept Lock version of: Three-Domain Sensory Socket Model of Memory v1.7:A Retrieval-Dominance Structural Hypothesis Author:Hisashi Suga(Gaasu13 / Ikigakusha / COME HERE GAASU FOREST) Abstract This paper proposes a structural hypothesis that memory retrieval may be organised through three dominant sensory socket routes: - Auditory-dominant route- Olfactory-dominant route- Visual-dominant route The model does not claim fixed personality categories, learning-style classifications, mind-reading, diagnosis, prediction of individuals, or complete theories of consciousness. Instead, it proposes a retrieval-dominance framework in which different sensory pathways may preferentially trigger access to memory resources under specific contexts. The framework is presented as a static Concept Lock architecture and includes explicit audit boundaries, falsifiability conditions, operationalisation requirements, and non-circularity safeguards. Boundary Conditions This work does NOT claim: - a complete theory of memory- a complete theory of consciousness- diagnosis of individuals- personality classification- learning-style validation- surveillance applications- military applications- coercive applications The current framework is limited to a static retrieval-dominance architecture and does not model dynamic temporal propagation, inhibitory competition, trauma pathways, negative resonance channels, or high-noise dynamic environments. Governance Axis Ethical axis:Peace / Non-violence / Dignity Dual-use boundary:NO militaryNO surveillanceNO coercion Final axis:Audit-firstFACT-BASEDNO OVERCLAIMNON-CIRCULARITY

Three-Domain Sensory Socket Model of Memory v1.7: A Retrieval-Dominance Structural Hypothesis

Key Points

Abstract

Cite This Study