Conceptual framework proposes that memory is accessed via auditory, olfactory, or visual pathways, suggesting new retrieval dynamics.
This record contains the final Concept Lock version of: Three-Domain Sensory Socket Model of Memory v1.7:A Retrieval-Dominance Structural Hypothesis Author:Hisashi Suga(Gaasu13 / Ikigakusha / COME HERE GAASU FOREST) Abstract This paper proposes a structural hypothesis that memory retrieval may be organised through three dominant sensory socket routes: - Auditory-dominant route- Olfactory-dominant route- Visual-dominant route The model does not claim fixed personality categories, learning-style classifications, mind-reading, diagnosis, prediction of individuals, or complete theories of consciousness. Instead, it proposes a retrieval-dominance framework in which different sensory pathways may preferentially trigger access to memory resources under specific contexts. The framework is presented as a static Concept Lock architecture and includes explicit audit boundaries, falsifiability conditions, operationalisation requirements, and non-circularity safeguards. Boundary Conditions This work does NOT claim: - a complete theory of memory- a complete theory of consciousness- diagnosis of individuals- personality classification- learning-style validation- surveillance applications- military applications- coercive applications The current framework is limited to a static retrieval-dominance architecture and does not model dynamic temporal propagation, inhibitory competition, trauma pathways, negative resonance channels, or high-noise dynamic environments. Governance Axis Ethical axis:Peace / Non-violence / Dignity Dual-use boundary:NO militaryNO surveillanceNO coercion Final axis:Audit-firstFACT-BASEDNO OVERCLAIMNON-CIRCULARITY
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hisashi Suga (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: