Key result
gSPECT-MPI stress strain models show good CAD discrimination with an AUC of 0.85.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the interobserver reproducibility of left ventricular strain measurements, determine rest and stress cutoff values, and assess strain reserve using gSPECT-MPI.
Does gSPECT-MPI-derived myocardial strain and strain reserve provide reproducible cutoff values to discriminate patients with coronary artery disease from healthy subjects?
Observational (n=127)
Does gSPECT-MPI-derived myocardial strain and strain reserve provide reproducible cutoff values to discriminate patients with coronary artery disease from healthy subjects?
gSPECT-MPI-derived myocardial strain and strain reserve measurements are reproducible and provide clinically relevant cutoff values for identifying patients with coronary artery disease.
Supports gSPECT-MPI strain cutoffs for CAD discrimination; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Purpose This study aimed to assess interobserver reproducibility of left ventricular global longitudinal (LS), circumferential (CS), and radial (RS) myocardial strain measurements, to determine cutoff values including coronary territory, ventricular wall, and ventricular region-specific measurements at rest and under stress, and to evaluate strain reserve using gSPECT-MPI. Methods We prospectively analyzed 127 patients undergoing gSPECT-MPI with myocardial strain assessment using SyncTool™ (Emory Cardiac Toolbox™). The reference group included 65 apparently healthy subjects with normal gSPECT findings (age 61.6 ± 11 years; 42.7% men), and the case group with 62 patients with coronary artery disease (age 66.8 ± 11 years; 80% men). Results Interobserver variability for global LS, CS and RS was good to excellent at rest and during stress (global LS: rest ICC = 0.86, stress ICC = 0.81; global CS: rest ICC = 0.85, stress ICC = 0.87; global RS: rest ICC = 0.74, stress ICC = 0.80). Optimal cutoff values at rest and stress were: LS-rest >-18.75, LS-stress >-22.75, CS-rest >-36.55, CS-stress >-38.15, RS-rest < 34.65, RS-stress < 45.15. Reserve cutoff values were: LS absolute difference (LS-AD) >-0.19, CS-AD >-2.45, RS-AD < 0.19, LS relative change (LS-RCH) < 0.52, CS-RCH <-16.86, RS-RCH <-3.06, LS ratio (LS-R) < 1.01, CS-R < 0.83 and RS-R < 0.97. The optimal model (stress global LS > − 22.75, stress global CS > − 38.15, LS-RCH < 0.52, and RS-RCH < − 3.06) demonstrated good discrimination for case-group classification (AUC, 0.85; sensitivity, 79%; specificity, 70%). Conclusions This study establishes reproducible and clinically relevant cutoff values for gSPECT-MPI-derived myocardial strain and strain reserve, filling an important gap in current literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Romero-Farina et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=127). gSPECT-MPI-derived myocardial strain and strain reserve vs. Healthy subjects was evaluated on Case-group classification (coronary artery disease vs healthy subjects) (AUC 0.85). An optimal model of gSPECT-MPI-derived stress global longitudinal and circumferential strain and strain reserve demonstrated good discrimination for coronary artery disease (AUC 0.85; sensitivity 79%; specificity 70%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: