PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 12, 2017British Journal of Sports Medicine247 citations

Quadriceps strengthening with and without blood flow restriction in the treatment of patellofemoral pain: a double-blind randomised trial

View Full Paper
LGLachlan S. GilesKWKate E. WebsterJMJodie A. McClelland

Key Result

Low-load blood flow restriction training produced a 93% greater reduction in pain with activities of daily living compared to standard quadriceps strengthening at 8 weeks (p=0.02).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=79)

Blinding

Double-blind

Randomization

Randomly allocated

Structured PICO

Does low-load blood flow restriction training improve pain and function compared to standard quadriceps strengthening in patients with patellofemoral pain?

P
Population
79 participants with patellofemoral pain followed for 8 weeks of intervention and up to 6 months.
I
Intervention
Low-load blood flow restriction (BFR) training (8 weeks of leg press and leg extension at 30% of 1RM)
C
Comparator
Standardised quadriceps strengthening (8 weeks of leg press and leg extension at 70% of 1RM)
O
Outcome
Kujala Patellofemoral Score, Visual Analogue Scale for 'worst pain' and 'pain with daily activity', isometric knee extensor torque, and quadriceps muscle thickness at 8 weeks and 6 monthspatient reported

Low-load blood flow restriction training may provide greater reduction in daily activity pain compared to standard heavy resistance training in patients with patellofemoral pain.

Main Result

p-value: p=0.02

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quadriceps strengthening exercises are part of the treatment of patellofemoral pain (PFP), but the heavy resistance exercises may aggravate knee pain. Blood flow restriction (BFR) training may provide a low-load quadriceps strengthening method to treat PFP. METHODS: Seventy-nine participants were randomly allocated to a standardised quadriceps strengthening (standard) or low-load BFR. Both groups performed 8 weeks of leg press and leg extension, the standard group at 70% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM) and the BFR group at 30% of 1RM. Interventions were compared using repeated-measures analysis of variance for Kujala Patellofemoral Score, Visual Analogue Scale for 'worst pain' and 'pain with daily activity', isometric knee extensor torque (Newton metre) and quadriceps muscle thickness (cm). Subgroup analyses were performed on those participants with painful resisted knee extension at 60°. RESULTS: Sixty-nine participants (87%) completed the study (standard, n=34; BFR, n=35). The BFR group had a 93% greater reduction in pain with activities of daily living (p=0.02) than the standard group. Participants with painful resisted knee extension (n=39) had greater increases in knee extensor torque with BFR than standard (p<0.01). No between-group differences were found for change in Kujala Patellofemoral Score (p=0.31), worst pain (p=0.24), knee extensor torque (p=0.07) or quadriceps thickness (p=0.2). No difference was found between interventions at 6 months. CONCLUSION: Compared with standard quadriceps strengthening, low load with BFR produced greater reduction in pain with daily living at 8 weeks in people with PFP. Improvements were similar between groups in worst pain and Kujala score. The subgroup with painful resisted knee extension had larger improvements in quadriceps strength from BFR. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 12614001164684.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Giles et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Patellofemoral pain (PFP) (n=79). Low-load blood flow restriction (BFR) training vs. Standardised quadriceps strengthening at 70% of 1RM was evaluated on Kujala Patellofemoral Score, Visual Analogue Scale for 'worst pain' and 'pain with daily activity', isometric knee extensor torque and quadriceps muscle thickness (p=0.02). Low-load blood flow restriction training produced a 93% greater reduction in pain with activities of daily living compared to standard quadriceps strengthening at 8 weeks (p=0.02).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a27ec1aa5ed3bbc751aa0aehttps://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096329
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper