The major groups of m o t ~l e cryptofauna lnhab~tlng dead coral substrata across several environmental zones of Davies Reef In the central Great Barner Reef, Austral~a, have been quantified In general terms of both numbers and b ~o m a s s the main groups of e p ~b e n t h ~c cryptofauna were harpach c o ~d copepods, g a m m a r ~d amph~pods, syll~d polychaetes and gastropod n~olluscs Other crustaceans abundant In some locat~ons were so pods t a n a ~d s and ostracods Copepods compr~sed 55 to 60 % of total number of cryptofauna over all reef locations and up to 28 % of b ~o m a s s Polychaetes were usually the dominant biomass component of the fauna Abundance of total cryptofauna vaned w t h reef locat~on, being h ~g h e s t on the fore-reef region In terms of both density and biomass Damself~sh terntones were shown to be a refuge for cryptofauna In all locat~ons of the reef Mean density of anlmals i n s ~d e territories was 58 300 m-2 an average of 3 6 tlmes h ~g h e r than on adjacent, well-grazed surfaces Cryptofaunal abundance was closely related to algal abundance and not complex~ty of the coral rock substratum It IS predicted that cryptofauna are s ~g n ~f ~c a n t consumers of epilithic algae and associated matenal In locations such as damselfish terntones, on coral reefs
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Klumpp et al. (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: