Key result
Pre-TAVR corticosteroids are linked to higher vascular complication risk despite conflicting risk ratios.
Why the study?
Corticosteroid use is associated with vascular fragility, prolonged wound healing, and infections, prompting an evaluation of outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR using corticosteroids versus those who were not.
Does corticosteroid therapy increase vascular complications and life-threatening bleeding in patients undergoing TAVR?
Meta-Analysis (n=4,247)
Yes
Does corticosteroid therapy increase vascular complications and life-threatening bleeding in patients undergoing TAVR?
Relative Risk: 0.63 (95% CI 0.35–0.9)
p-value: p=<.001
Corticosteroid therapy prior to TAVR is associated with increased risks of access-site vascular complications and major bleeding, highlighting the need for careful procedural planning in these patients.
Corticosteroid use may increase TAVR vascular complications; leaves open causality versus confounding in observational data.
BackgroundCorticosteroid use is associated with vascular fragility, prolonged wound healing, and infections. Therefore, we sought to compare outcomes between patients with aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement who were using corticosteroids versus those who were not.MethodsThis is a study-level meta-analysis and meta-regression of observational studies. The primary end points of this study were rates of vascular complication (both major and minor), life-threatening bleeding, and 30-day mortality. Secondary end points included acute kidney injury rates, annular rupture, cardiac tamponade, closure device failure, coronary obstruction, periprocedural myocardial infarction, permanent pacemaker implantation, stroke, and specific vascular complications with its complementary therapy.ResultsAcross the studies, patients were slightly predominantly female, older, and had a mean left ventricular ejection fraction of more than 50% with an intermediate Logistic EuroScore II. Significant differences were observed in the vascular complication rates between patients on corticosteroids and those who were corticosteroid-free (relative risk, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.35-0.90; P <.001), driven primarily by arterial occlusion, surgery, balloon angioplasty, and stenting (relative risk, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.32-0.93; P <.05). There was no difference in the 30-day mortality. No differences were seen in the length of corticosteroid therapies. For the secondary outcomes, there was an increased risk of annular rupture and cardiac tamponade in patients taking corticosteroids.ConclusionsIn conclusion, this is the first meta-analysis with meta-regression that showed a higher risk for vascular complications and life-threatening bleeding in patients on corticosteroid therapy undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, despite no increase in the risk of 30-day mortality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Macedo et al. (2022) conducted a meta-analysis in Severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) (n=4,247). Corticosteroid therapy vs. No corticosteroid therapy was evaluated on Vascular complications (both major and minor) (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.35-0.90, p=<.001). Corticosteroid therapy prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement showed a significant difference in vascular complications (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.35-0.90, p<0.001), which the authors concluded represented a higher risk of access-site injury.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: