Exploratory analysis evaluates the impact of AFP and mRECIST on outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, suggesting better response stratification.
Backgrounds/Aims: To evaluate the combination of modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in patients with intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving combination therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and a programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitor, focusing on stable disease (SD) patients with low AFP levels.Methods: We analyzed 79 patients who received TKI plus PD-1 inhibitor combination therapy from 2018 to 2021.Based on AFP at 8 weeks, patients were divided into Group A (AFP ≥200 ng/mL, n = 26) and Group B (AFP <200 ng/mL, n = 53).Kaplan-Meier and Cox models assessed overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).Results: Only Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C independently predicted OS (hazard ratio [HR] 7.193, p < 0.001).For PFS, independent predictors included tumor diameter (HR 1.009, p = 0.025), mRECIST response (global likelihood-ratio p = 0.070), and AFP group (HR 0.474, p = 0.049).Virus type was excluded due to collinearity with antiviral therapy.Among SD patients, low AFP was associated with longer PFS than high AFP (24.0 vs. 3.0 months, p < 0.001).In Group B, low-AFP SD showed numerically longer PFS than partial response (24.0 vs. 15.0 months; HR 0.389; p = 0.116).Conclusions: This exploratory analysis suggests that the prognostic value of AFP is largely mediated by tumor burden.While mRE-CIST response predicted PFS but not OS, low-AFP SD patients exhibited favorable outcomes in both PFS and OS.These findings indicate that integrating mRECIST with AFP may enhance response stratification, though prospective validation is necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: