Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental evaluation shows differing dynamic responses of strain gauge pressure transducers under vibration, indicating susceptibility to measurement errors.
This paper presents an experimental approach for evaluating the dynamic characteristics of strain gauge pressure transducers under pulsed ultrasonic (vibration-like) excitation using spectral transfer-function identification without prior knowledge of the emitter frequency response. Two silicon-sapphire strain gauge pressure transducers with different sensing-element designs (types A and B, nominal range 0-100 kPa) were tested. The estimated normalized frequency responses show distinct resonance patterns: type A exhibits pronounced maxima at approximately 6.4, 23.5, and 68.6 kHz with peak normalized magnitude H f ≈ 0.99, 0.56, and 0.88, respectively, whereas type B shows a smoother response with the dominant maximum near 44.4 kHz ( H f ≈ 0.44). The peak response of type A is about 2.3× higher than that of type B, indicating higher susceptibility to vibration-induced dynamic errors in the corresponding bands. The proposed technique supports comparative assessment of vibration resistance and dynamic measurement errors under controlled laboratory broadband excitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jurayeva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: