Retrospective study describes positive experiences with telemedicine consultations for neurological issues after COVID-19.
Objectives To describe patient-reported experience with a structured telemedicine video consultation (TVC) pathway in routine neurological care among adults with persistent neurological symptoms with onset after SARS-CoV-2 infection or in temporal association with COVID-19 vaccination. Methods This single-center retrospective cross-sectional study examined TVC delivered in routine clinical care at the Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (11/2022–12/2023). Patients with neurological symptoms persisting ≥3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection or occurring in temporal association with COVID-19 vaccination were included. Data included demographics, symptom assessments, validated questionnaires on mood, fatigue, and subjective memory, audiovisual cognitive screening, and a post-consultation survey of patient-reported telemedicine experience. Results Forty-one patients (mean age 41.3±12.8 years; 61% female) were included. The median home-to-clinic distance was 356 km; and 39% reported mobility limitations affecting in-person attendance. Patients reported positive immediate experiences: most found scheduling easy, reported good audio/video quality, and considered the consultation relevant and time-saving. A minority reported technical difficulties or required assistance. Patients reported high fatigue levels (Fatigue Severity Scale 5.3±1.8), frequent subjective cognitive symptoms, moderate subjective memory satisfaction (Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire-Satisfaction Domain, 47.7±17.3), and mean Montreal Cognitive Assessment score of 27.3±2.3. Discussion These exploratory findings indicate positive patient-reported experience with a structured TVC pathway in routine neurological care. Fatigue and subjective cognitive difficulties were common across the selected cohort. This study describes a tele-neurology workflow integrating document pre-review, digital symptom assessment, remote history taking, and cognitive screening. Further controlled longitudinal studies are needed to determine the clinical role, safety, and equitable implementation of such approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raeder et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: