Demonstrates enhanced hygienic safety in urine-diverting dry toilets, highlighting effective composting strategies.
A diagram illustrating the composting process in a dry toilet chamber. Inputs of human faeces and sawdust undergo mixing and passive aeration, triggering a feedback loop of microbial activity, heat generation, temperature, and moisture content, resulting in heat loss and water vapor. The final compost output is characterized by a graph showing E. coli decay over time, driven by temperatures above 50 °C. The entire process integrates mathematical modelling through mass balance and kinetic equations to optimize chamber volume design. Thermophilic composting of source-separated human feces offers a strategy to reduce storage time and enhance hygienic safety in urine-diverting dry toilet (UDDT) systems. Bench-scale insulated batch reactors were operated for 30 days with three feces-to-sawdust (F/S) ratios (60, 40, and 30%, total solids [TS] basis) and monitored for temperature, moisture, volatile solids (VS), and thermotolerant coliforms (Escherichia coli). Sustained thermophilic conditions (>50 °C) were achieved at F/S = 30%, resulting in >60% VS reduction within approximately 7 days. E. coli concentrations declined below detection by day 14, and a modeled 5-log reduction was achieved within approximately 26 days under sustained thermophilic exposure. A coupled mathematical model describing organic matter degradation, moisture evolution, temperature-dependent kinetics, and pathogen inactivation was calibrated against experimental data from the optimized configuration. Model performance was strong for moisture prediction (R2 = 0.76) and moderate for VS reduction (R2 = 0.57), reflecting substrate heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that hygienization time is highly dependent on the effective inactivation constant, supporting the incorporation of a safety factor in field applications. The framework enables performance-based engineering design of mixed, passively aerated UDDT composting chambers, providing a process-based alternative to empirical storage guidelines when sustained thermophilic conditions can be verified.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonçalves et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: