Online hate speech against school students is increasing globally. This paper examines how digital literacy programmes and school interventions can help students aged 10 to 18 recognise, resist and respond to hate speech in online spaces. The study reviews research published between the years, 2020 and 2026. It expatiates the causes and effects of online aggression among adolescents. Qualitative data gathered through structured thematic discussions with 16 educationists drawn from government, aided and unaided schools across the State of Kerala. Inductive thematic analysis of these discussions informs the practical approaches presented, drawing on Social Emotional Learning (SEL) and critical media literacy frameworks. The paper highlights several initiatives used in Kerala schools. These include the KITE fake news detection curriculum, the State Council of Educational Research and Training (SCERT) value education framework, the Student Police Cadet programme and the Suraksha Mitram support system. Two conceptual models guide the discussion. The first model explains how films, games and digital media can increase hostility and aggressive behaviour among students. The second model presents a four-component resilience framework that helps students develop responsible digital behaviour and stronger critical thinking. This framework is explicitly exploratory and normative in character: it synthesises existing evidence and programme documentation into a prescriptive architecture designed for iterative evaluation and refinement. The paper recommends a multi-level prevention approach. It focuses on student skill development, positive peer influence, teacher training, family participation and clear school policies. The approach suits government, aided and unaided schools in Kerala.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joseph et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: