Evaluates phenylalanine oxidation in PAH deficiency, suggesting personalized PKU treatments.
With the expanding treatment landscape for phenylketonuria (PKU), there is a growing need for a reliable, non-invasive method to quantify residual phenylalanine hydroxylase (PAH) activity and to determine disease severity to guide individualized treatment strategies. The 13 C-Phenylalanine (Phe) breath test ( 13 C-PBT) has the potential to measure in vivo oxidation of Phe by quantifying conversion of 13 C-Phe to 13 CO 2 . Although the 13 C-PBT has previously been used in PKU, its test-retest reliability in PAH deficient individuals has not been studied. The aim of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of the 13 C-PBT in individuals with PAH deficiency and to evaluate the association between 13 C-Phe oxidation parameters and disease severity. To establish preliminary reference values and to optimize protocol, 10 healthy adults underwent the 13 C-PBT once. Subsequently, 10 individuals with varying severities of PAH deficiency completed the test twice. After an overnight fast, all participants received an oral dose of 6 mg/kg 13 C-Phe. Both area under the curve (AUC) and the maximum 13 C-Phe oxidation showed a good-to-excellent test-retest reliability, expressed as an ICC of 0.93 (95% CI 0.71–0.98) and 0.91 (95% CI 0.68–0.98) respectively. When stratifying for the genotypic phenotype value (GPV), it was shown that a lower GPV was associated with lower oxidation parameters in comparison to higher GPV levels. These findings support the 13 C-PBT as a reliable, easy to perform, non-invasive measure of in vivo PAH function that could potentially aid in the interpretation of PAH variants and the assessment of treatment response. Take home message The 13 C-Phenylalanine breath test shows good-to-excellent test-retest reliability in adults with phenylalanine hydroxylase deficiency, supporting its potential role as a non-invasive measure of in vivo PAH activity that may aid individualized treatment in PKU.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haitjema et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: