Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey researchers are increasingly adopting hybrid sampling designs to address the limitations of traditional probability sampling, especially when studying rare or hard-to-reach populations. Challenges such as high screening costs, low statistical efficiency, and operational constraints make purely probability-based approaches impractical in many contexts. This article uses public data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey to demonstrate how one can make population estimates from a hybrid sampling strategy that combines data from a stratified, multistage probability sample with data from a non-probability sample within the same primary sampling units as the probability sample. We outline a framework and discuss methods for analyzing data from a hybrid sample such as this, where covariates and survey outcomes are observed in both the probability and non-probability samples. We present a case study to illustrate the framework. We provide the case study R code in the supplementary material.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elkasabi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: