Meta-analysis evaluates weight loss outcomes of a behavioral weight management program by race and socioeconomic factors, highlighting effectiveness and disparities.
Racially and ethnically marginalized groups experience disproportionately high obesity rates, but are underrepresented in clinical trials of obesity treatments. Obesity treatments seem less effective for marginalized groups, but studies are characterized by small samples, clinic-based treatments, and little attention to socioeconomic position. We evaluated weight loss outcomes of a widely-available behavioral weight management program (Weight Watchers; WW) by race, ethnicity, income and education. We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis of 11 WW intervention studies published from 2000-2025. T-tests compared weight loss between intervention and control participants within race, ethnicity, income and education subgroups. Among intervention participants, fixed effects multivariable regression estimated the odds of achieving a 5% weight loss across subgroups. Here we show that among 2972 participants (19% Non-Hispanic Black, 7% Hispanic/Latine; 30% <$50,000/y) and a mean (SD) weight of 96.2 (18.1) kg, WW interventions produce significantly greater weight loss than controls in all subgroups at 3, 6, and 12 months. Within the intervention group, Non-Hispanic Black participants are significantly less likely to experience a 5% weight loss than Non-Hispanic White participants at 3, 6, and 12 months, but there are no differences by income or education. A widely-available weight management program is more effective than controls for weight loss in all race, ethnicity, income, and education subgroups. However, the likelihood of clinically significant weight loss varies when comparing across racial and ethnic groups. These data can assist practitioners and patients when choosing evidence-based approaches to manage obesity among racially and ethnically marginalized groups. Obesity treatments seem to be less effective for racially and ethnically marginalized groups, who have disproportionately high obesity rates, but studies often have few racially or ethnically diverse participants, or do not consider how income or education affect treatment program success. We combined data from 11 studies of a widely-available weight management program to assess how well it produced weight loss by subgroups of race, ethnicity, income and education. Within all subgroups, the program produced greater weight loss for intervention participants relative to controls; however, it was less effective at achieving clinically significant weight loss for Non-Hispanic Black than White intervention participants. Findings reflect a need to address cultural and social contexts when designing or choosing obesity treatments for diverse groups. Dean et al conduct a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for a widely-available behavioral weight management program, by race, ethnicity, income and education. The programs produce weight loss in all subgroups compared to controls, but are less successful at achieving 5% weight loss for Non-Hispanic Black than White intervention participants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dean et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: