Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Empirical evidence shows SDG disclosure positively influences firm value among companies in Southeast Asia, suggesting transparency matters.
Amid growing global attention to corporate sustainability and responsible investment, the disclosure of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) has emerged as an important component of non-financial reporting. However, the extent to which SDG disclosure contributes to firm value remains underexplored, particularly in emerging markets. This study examines the association between SDG disclosure in corporate reports and firm value among 660 publicly listed companies across four Southeast Asian countries: Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Singapore. SDG disclosure is measured using 17 SDG indicators derived from the Refinitiv database and should be interpreted as a measure of disclosure breadth rather than disclosure quality or depth. The analysis begins with descriptive statistics to illustrate the distribution of key variables, followed by ANOVA to assess differences in SDG disclosure across countries and industries. Hypothesis testing is then conducted using multiple regression analysis with robust standard errors, with firm value proxied by price-to-book value (PBV). Several robustness checks are performed, including winsorised regression, year-by-year regressions, and regression models incorporating country and industry dummy variables. The results indicate that SDG disclosure is positively associated with firm value, although the relationship is interpreted as correlational rather than causal because of the short observation period and potential endogeneity. The findings also show that SDG disclosure is unevenly distributed across goals and countries, with SDG 8 and SDG 13 receiving the highest attention, while SDG 2 and SDG 14 remain among the least disclosed. These results highlight the importance of sustainability transparency in shaping market valuation and underscore the need for more balanced, comparable, and quality-oriented sustainability reporting frameworks across the region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pratama et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: