Key result
Apitegromab preserves ~1.9 kg more lean mass vs. placebo when added to tirzepatide.
Why the study?
Does apitegromab added to tirzepatide preserve lean mass during weight loss at 24 weeks in adults with overweight or obesity?
RCT (n=102)
Double-blind
1:1
Does apitegromab added to tirzepatide preserve lean mass during weight loss at 24 weeks in adults with overweight or obesity?
Selective myostatin inhibition with apitegromab is well tolerated and preserves 54.9% of lean mass relative to placebo without attenuating total weight loss in adults treated with tirzepatide.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“New myostatin‑blocking therapies may help preserve muscle during GLP1RA treatment, although evidence in older adults with HFpEF is still limited.”
Apitegromab may limit lean mass loss during tirzepatide therapy; extends RCT evidence for myostatin inhibition in obesity pharmacotherapy.
Loss of lean mass in proportion to total weight loss is observed with incretin mimetic therapies such as tirzepatide and has the potential to adversely affect health and function. Apitegromab is an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits myostatin activation and is, thereby, capable of increasing muscle mass. In the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 EMBRAZE study, adults with overweight or obesity ( n = 102) were randomized 1:1 to receive tirzepatide plus apitegromab (10 mg kg −1 ) or tirzepatide plus placebo. At week 24, apitegromab resulted in a least square mean (80% confidence interval (CI)) of 1.9 (1.2−2.7) kg less lean mass loss than placebo ( P = 0.001), despite similar total body weight loss between groups, representing a 54.9% retention of lean mass relative to placebo. In participants receiving apitegromab, trough concentrations of apitegromab and total latent myostatin, a pharmacodynamic marker, both increased over time and reached a plateau after approximately 16 weeks. Incidence of adverse events (AEs) (% (95% CI)) was generally similar across apitegromab-treated participants and placebo-treated participants, with 39 of 51 (76% (63−86%)) and 36 of 51 (71% (57−81%)) participants experiencing an AE, respectively. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were balanced and experienced by one of 51 (2% (0−10%)) participants in each arm. In summary, this proof-of-concept study demonstrated that selective targeting of myostatin by apitegromab was well tolerated and effective in preserving lean mass when combined with tirzepatide. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06445075 .
Journal, society, and media accounts. Useful signal, not independent expert judgment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pratley et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Overweight or obesity (n=102). Apitegromab plus tirzepatide vs. Placebo plus tirzepatide was evaluated on Change in lean mass at week 24 (MD 1.9 kg, 95% CI 1.2-2.7 (80% CI), p=0.001). Apitegromab plus tirzepatide resulted in 1.9 kg (80% CI 1.2-2.7; P=0.001) less lean mass loss at 24 weeks than tirzepatide plus placebo, representing 54.9% lean mass retention.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: