Demonstrates priority-aware scheduling in UAV landing operations, suggesting autonomous improvements in disaster relief.
Multi-runway sequencing of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) at temporary disaster relief aerodromes presents a priority-heterogeneous scheduling problem under class-asymmetric wake turbulence constraints. We formulate this as a priority-weighted Markov decision process with a deliberately minimalist reward—per-step class weights for completed landings, with no shaping or hand-crafted safety logic—and extend it with per-UAV operational deadlines (encoding en-route endurance consumption) and per-runway queue capacity constraints that produce a non-trivial action mask. We train a Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO) agent and benchmark it against six baselines spanning deterministic optimisation (Joint-LA-1), stochastic lookahead (Stochastic-LA), and online tree search (MCTS). Across 100 paired evaluation episodes, PPO matches the operational standard Priority-FCFS within 2.7% (p = 0.124, not significant); Joint-LA-1, the strongest non-learned baseline, outperforms PPO by 3.2% (p = 0.043). Despite near-identical aggregate throughput, PPO autonomously develops a runway specialisation pattern—concentrating 60% of high-priority landings on a single strip while routing 93% of emergency arrivals to the remaining strips—that emerges entirely from the reward signal. Under looser deadlines, the PPO–PFCFS gap narrows to −0.5%, and wake symmetry ablation reveals that PPO outperforms Priority-FCFS by 46.5% when the asymmetric wake structure is removed. These results demonstrate that priority-aware capacity reservation can emerge without embedded domain knowledge, and that simple heuristics are near-optimal under tight operational constraints—a finding with direct implications for autonomous scheduling in disaster relief aviation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: