Maps spatial b-value variations in seismic events, indicating areas with data inadequacy.
We present a framework for spatial Gutenberg–Richter (GR) b -value mapping in which three criteria are explicitly and jointly quantified and enforced: spatial locality (each local estimate uses only events within a bounded distance of the evaluation point), statistical support (each estimate is required to rest on a sufficient number of complete-magnitude events), and estimator uncertainty (a confidence measure is computed and reported for every estimate). The method couples (i) a kernel-smoothed map of event density with (ii) a local b -value estimator that, at each grid point, uses the k nearest earthquakes and computes b from the positive differences between their magnitudes following the method of Lippiello and Petrillo (in J Geophys Res Solid Earth 129(2):e2023JB027849, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB027849 ), which is robust to catalog incompleteness, and (iii) an effective sample size Neff N eff that measures how many events effectively contribute to each local estimate once the distance weighting is taken into account. Locality is imposed by requiring the radius rₖ r k enclosing the k nearest events to stay below a chosen bound rₘₐₓ r max ; statistical support is imposed by minimum values of Neff N eff and of the local complete-magnitude event count nₜₐᵢₗ n tail ; uncertainty is obtained by a weighted bootstrap that yields a map of the standard error (SE) of b , together with percentile-based $$95%$$ 95 % confidence intervals. The pair (k,rₘₐₓ) ( k , r max ) is chosen by a single numerical score that combines spatial coverage, locality, support, and uncertainty. We test the estimator on a synthetic catalog whose true b ( x , y ) field is known by construction, and then apply the framework to a catalog of N=42,007 N = 42 , 007 events recorded across Turkiye between 18 January 2023 and 30 September 2025 by the Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute (KOERI). The resulting maps reveal interpretable spatial variations in b while suppressing estimates in regions where the data do not provide adequate information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ER et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: