Scoping review explores evidence and identifies gaps in health technology reassessment across jurisdictions, indicating areas for improvement.
The purpose of this review is explicitly exploratory and mapping-oriented: to chart the landscape of published evidence across jurisdictions, identify key concepts, and surface gaps in the literature, objectives that are well-suited to scoping review methodology as defined by the JBI framework. The evidence base spans multiple study designs (quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods) and requires an approach that can accommodate variation in terminology and reporting practices across jurisdictions
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darmawan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: