Key result
Lumipulse NfL assay correlates strongly with Ella reference measurements across CSF and serum.
Why the study?
Neurofilament light chain proteins are promising biomarkers of neuroaxonal damage, and their measurement performance needed to be compared between the Ella microfluidic platform and the Lumipulse fully automated system in patients with cognitive disorders.
Does the Lumipulse assay correlate with the Ella assay for measuring NfL concentrations in patients with cognitive impairment?
Cross-Sectional (n=30)
No
Does the Lumipulse assay correlate with the Ella assay for measuring NfL concentrations in patients with cognitive impairment?
Establishing a reliable conversion formula between Ella and Lumipulse assays allows for the cross-study comparison and merging of NfL measurement datasets in patients with cognitive impairment.
Supports NfL assay interchangeability for dataset merging in cognitive disorders; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Neurofilament light chain proteins (NfLs) are considered a promising biomarker of neuroaxonal damage in several neurological diseases. Their measurement in the serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with dementia may be especially useful. Our aim was to compare the NfL measurement performance of two advanced technologies, specifically the Ella™ microfluidic platform and the Lumipulse™ fully automated system, in patients with cognitive disorders. METHODS: Thirty subjects with neurodegenerative cognitive disorders (10 with Alzheimer's Disease, 10 with Frontotemporal Dementia, and 10 with non-progressive Mild Cognitive Impairment) seen at the Cognitive Neurology Clinic of Modena University Hospital (Italy) underwent CSF and serum NfL measurement with both the Ella™ microfluidic platform (Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA)) and the Lumipulse™ fully automated system for the CLEIA (Fujirebio Inc., Ghent, Belgium). Correlation and regression analyses were applied to assess the association between NfL concentrations obtained with the two assays in CSF and serum. The Passing-Bablok regression method was employed to evaluate the agreement between the assays. RESULTS: There were high correlations between the two assays (r = 0.976, 95% CI. 0.950-0.989 for CSF vs. r = 0.923, 95% CI 0.842-0.964 for serum). A Passing-Bablok regression model was estimated to explain the relationship between the two assays, allowing us to switch from one to the other when only one assay was available. CONCLUSIONS: We found a good degree of correlation between the two methods in patients with neurocognitive disorders. We also established a method that will allow comparisons between results obtained with either technique, allowing for meta-analyses and larger sample sizes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urbano et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Cognitive Impairment (Alzheimer's Disease, Frontotemporal Dementia, Mild Cognitive Impairment) (n=30). Lumipulse fully automated CLEIA system vs. Ella microfluidic platform was evaluated on Correlation of NfL concentrations between assays in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (r = 0.976, 95% CI 0.950-0.989). The Lumipulse assay demonstrated a high correlation with the Ella assay for measuring NfL concentrations in CSF (r = 0.976) and serum (r = 0.923), allowing the estimation of a reliable conversion formula.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: