Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
With the aim of improving the utility of the DFT-D3 empirical dispersion correction, we herein generalize the DFT-D3 damping function by optimizing an additional parameter, an exponent, which controls the rate at which the dispersion tail is activated. This method - DFT-D3(op), shorthand for "optimized power," where power refers to the newly introduced exponent - is then parametrized for use with ten popular density functional approximations across a small set of noncovalent interactions and isomerization energies; the resulting methods are then evaluated across a large independent test set of 2475 noncovalent binding energies and isomerization energies. We find that the DFT-D3(op) tail represents a substantial improvement over existing damping functions, as it affords significant reductions in errors associated with noncovalent interaction energies and geometries. The revPBE0-D3(op) and MS2-D3(op) methods in particular stand out, and our extensive testing indicates they are competitive with other modern density functionals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Witte et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: