PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 2004American Journal of Public Health173 citationsOpen Access

Urban–Rural Shifts in Intentional Firearm Death: Different Causes, Same Results

View Full Paper
CBCharles C. BranasMNMichael L. NanceMEMichael R. Elliott

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We analyzed urban-rural differences in intentional firearm death. METHODS: We analyzed 584629 deaths from 1989 to 1999 assigned to 3141 US counties, using negative binomial regressions and an 11-category urban-rural variable. RESULTS: The most urban counties had 1.03 (95% confidence interval CI=0.87, 1.20) times the adjusted firearm death rate of the most rural counties. The most rural counties experienced 1.54 (95% CI=1.29, 1.83) times the adjusted firearm suicide rate of the most urban. The most urban counties experienced 1.90 (95% CI=1.50, 2.40) times the adjusted firearm homicide rate of the most rural. Similar opposing trends were not found for nonfirearm suicide or homicide. CONCLUSIONS: Firearm suicide in rural counties is as important a public health problem as firearm homicide in urban counties. Policymakers should become aware that intentional firearm deaths affect all types of communities in the United States.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Branas et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2a1a62cfaf3a1acaf86fb4https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.10.1750
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper