PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 1, 2026European Journal of Radiology Open0 citationsOpen Access

TotalSegmentator-AI for aortic segmentation in CT: Reliable performance in normal anatomy but limited utility in pathological aortic disease

View Full Paper
DRDania El RahalUniversity of LausanneCPChiara PozzessereUniversity Hospital of LausanneMGMarianna GuliziaUniversity Hospital of Lausanne

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Introduction: Accurate aortic segmentation on computed tomography angiography (CTA) is essential for diagnosing aortic disease, cardiovascular risk assessment, and surgical planning. Deep learning algorithms, such as TotalSegmentator-AI, offer fully automated multi-organ segmentation, yet their performance in pathological aortic conditions remains uncertain. This study performs a clinical stress-test of TotalSegmentator-AI, mapping its boundaries and structural failure modes across a spectrum of normal and pathological cases. Methods: In this monocentric, retrospective study, 60 CTA scans from 2014 to 2024 were categorized into six groups: young, elderly, aneurysm, dissection, venous phase, and non-contrast phase. TotalSegmentator-AI was applied without manual correction. Two radiologists independently rated six aortic segments per scan using a five-point qualitative scale. Quantitative segmentation errors were correlated with qualitative scores using Spearman’s correlation, and inter-reader agreement was assessed with weighted Cohen’s kappa. Results: All scans were successfully processed, yielding 360 aortic segments. Median segmentation quality was 4 IQR 4–5, with 77% rated good or excellent. Performance was consistent across segments (p = 0.16) but varied by category (p < 0.001): best in young patients (5 IQR 4–5) and adequate in non-contrast and venous-phase scans (4 IQR 4–5), poorest in dissections (3 IQR 3–4) and aneurysms (4 IQR 3–4). A strong negative correlation was observed between qualitative scores and quantitative errors (ρ =–1, p = 0.017). Inter-reader agreement was substantial (κ = 0.72). Conclusion: TotalSegmentator-AI achieves accurate aortic segmentation in normal anatomy but is inadequate for unsupervised clinical use in complex pathologies like aneurysms and dissections. Comprehensive human-in-the loop quality control or dedicated pathology-inclusive models are mandatory before AI-based segmentation can be safely integrated into vascular clinical workflows.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rahal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2a4b2cb1a0a4ffa5972f0chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2026.100772
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper