Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional study establishes reference intervals for neutrophil CD64 index in healthy adults, suggesting standardized disease diagnosis.
BACKGROUND: The neutrophil CD64 (nCD64) index is a potent biomarker for infectious diseases; however, the lack of standardized reference intervals (RIs) limits its clinical utility. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish and validate reference intervals (RIs) for the nCD64 index specifically for the Guangxi population using flow cytometry. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTINGS: Conducted in Guangxi, China. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 494 healthy adults (aged 18-83 years) were enrolled. Peripheral blood nCD64 expression was measured via flow cytometry. Reference intervals were determined using the non-parametric 95th percentile method (2.5th-97.5th) per CLSI EP28-A3c guidelines. Validation was performed in an independent cohort (n=30). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the 95% reference interval for the nCD64 index. Secondary outcomes included correlations between nCD64 index and sex, age, BMI, and primary hematological parameters. SAMPLE SIZE: 494 healthy adults for establishment, plus 30 independent subjects for validation. RESULTS: ) indicated no requirement for sex-specific partitioning. No significant correlations were observed between nCD64 and age, BMI, or primary hematological parameters. The established 95% RI was .08-0.94, with the 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the lower and upper limits were .08-.09 and .92-1.04. Validation confirmed the RI's reliability, with 97% (29/30) of results falling within the range. CONCLUSIONS: We established a robust RI (.08-.94) for the nCD64 index in the Guangxi population, which remained consistent across age and sex groups. This provides a standardized baseline for the diagnosis of inflammatory and infectious conditions in Southern China. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited to a single regional population (Guangxi) and did not include pediatric or pregnant populations. Additionally, potential confounding from subclinical inflammation or undiagnosed chronic infections cannot be completely excluded despite strict enrollment criteria.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: