Retrospective study assesses changes in astigmatism after MINIject implantation, indicating minimal impact on refractive outcomes.
Purpose: To assess the short-term impact of stand-alone MINIject (iSTAR Medical SA) implantation on astigmatism in a single-center retrospective study. Methods: Refractive and corneal astigmatism was investigated based on preoperative and postoperative subjective refraction and Scheimpflug tomography measurements at 3 months (D90) using power vectors: the spherical equivalent M and the Jackson cross cylinder projections to the 0° and 90° (J 0 ) and to the 45° and 135° meridian (J 45 ). Results: A total of 60 eyes with glaucoma or ocular hypertony from 54 patients were included. Refractive cylinder did not change after stand-alone implantation (C D0 = −1.48 ± 1.52 diopters [D] vs C D90 = −1.36 ± 1.20 D, P = .30) and, analogously, no time course was observed in three-dimensional vector analysis ( P > .99). Anterior corneal surface astigmatism showed a near-significant change ( P = .07) in the two-dimensional vector analysis (J 0 ; J 45 ), primarily driven by the J 0 component ( P = .03), whereas the posterior surface remained unaffected ( P = .4). The mean absolute surgically induced astigmatism was 0.78 ± 0.53 D for the anterior surface and 0.22 ± 0.21 D for the posterior surface. Conclusions: Supraciliary MINIject implantation may induce minor short-term changes in anterior corneal astigmatism. However, when implanted as a stand-alone procedure, it does not affect refractive astigmatism. Therefore, astigmatic changes do not require specific emphasis during patient counseling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Englisch et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: