The effectiveness of antitrust remedies in abuse of dominance and monopolization cases within the digital market

January 1, 2026Open Access

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The research investigates the effectiveness of antitrust remedies in addressing abuse of market dominance and monopolization in digital markets.
Comparative analysis of antitrust enforcement practices in the EU and US.
Case studies including EU decisions on Google and Amazon, and the US lawsuit on Google Search.
Focus on structural causes such as network effects and innovation cycles.
EU remedies often limited by proportionality and tied to specific violations, potentially failing to address underlying incentives for anti-competitive behavior.
US approach allows for more flexible, forward-looking remedies due to broader judicial discretion.
Recommendations for better utilization of EU tools like commitment decisions and interim measures to enhance enforcement outcomes.

Comparative analysis reveals differences in antitrust enforcement effectiveness between the EU and US in digital markets, suggesting reform needs.

No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Yingtong Guo (2026) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share