Review integrates trial evidence on systemic therapy sequencing in advanced HCC, suggesting new treatment strategies.
Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has evolved from a linear, stepwise algorithm into a multidimensional and truly polyhedral process shaped by treatment response, liver function, and access to therapy. This review integrates evidence from phase II and III trials and real-world studies, including more than 4,000 patients across different and diverse global regions, to outline how sequencing beyond first-line immunotherapy is redefining clinical practice. After immune-based combinations, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain active and feasible options, achieving a median overall survival of approximately 10–11 months, while preservation of liver function consistently determines treatment eligibility and post-progression survival. Incorporation of the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) concept “upon response” (BCLC-UR) refines classification for patients achieving major responses or conversion and aligns staging with contemporary treatment dynamics. The CUSE framework—encompassing Complexity, Uncertainty, Subjectivity, and Emotion—reframes sequencing as an adaptive, patient-centered, and multifaceted process that integrates toxicity, feasibility, and patient values alongside efficacy. By structuring diverse clinical inputs into a unified interpretive model, CUSE supports multidisciplinary reasoning and enhances conceptual coherence in treatment sequencing. Conversion therapy and “drug-off” strategies following complete or major responses represent emerging frontiers, emphasizing that sequencing in HCC now extends beyond second-line therapy. Additionally, preserving hepatic function and applying polyhedral, data-informed decision frameworks are key to sustaining eligibility and optimizing outcomes across the continuum of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fortuny et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: