In healthy adults, normal LV global longitudinal strain was -20.8±2.0%, with men having significantly lower GLS than women (-20.1±1.8% vs -21.5±2.0%, P<0.001).
Cross-Sectional (n=147)
What are the normal values for LV global longitudinal strain using QLAB 10 in healthy adults, and how do anthropometric factors influence them?
This study establishes normative values for LV global longitudinal strain using QLAB 10 software, highlighting that male sex, higher BSA, and higher blood pressure negatively influence GLS.
Absolute Event Rate: -20.1% vs -21.5%
p-value: p=<.001
AIMS: Evaluation of left ventricular (LV) myocardial deformation by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) is useful for clinical and research purposes. However, strain measurements depend on the used software. Normative data for QLAB 10 (Philips) are scarce. Additionally, little is known about the influence of anthropometric factors. We aimed to establish normal adult STE-derived strain and strain rate values and to evaluate associations with anthropometrics. METHODS: One hundred fifty-five healthy subjects aged 20 to 72 years (≥28 subjects per decile) were prospectively gathered and examined with electrocardiography and two-dimensional echocardiography. With STE, we assessed peak systolic LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), segmental longitudinal strain, and strain rate from the three standard apical views. RESULTS: We included 147 healthy subjects (age 44.6±13.7 years, 50% female, GLS -20.8±2.0%). Men had significantly lower GLS than women (-20.1±1.8% vs -21.5±2.0%, P<.001). GLS was significantly lower in subjects with age above 55 years (P=.029), higher blood pressure (P<.001), higher body surface area (BSA, P<.001), larger LV end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes (both P<.001), lower LV ejection fraction (P<.001), and some indices of diastolic function. After multivariable regression analysis, the correlation with systolic blood pressure, E-wave, and LV end-systolic volume remained significant. The systolic strain rates of most segments correlated with BSA. CONCLUSIONS: Our study resulted in normative LV GLS values assessed with QLAB 10. Male sex, higher BSA, and higher blood pressure negatively influence GLS. Therefore, these factors should be taken into account for strain interpretation in clinical practice.
Menting et al. (Mon,) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy adults (n=147). Male sex vs. Female sex was evaluated on Peak systolic LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (p=<.001). In healthy adults, normal LV global longitudinal strain was -20.8±2.0%, with men having significantly lower GLS than women (-20.1±1.8% vs -21.5±2.0%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: