Compares effects of dexamethasone and bevacizumab on tumor metabolism in glioblastoma, suggesting differing immunometabolic impacts.
Background Dexamethasone (DEXA) is the routine therapy for tumor- or treatment-associated edema management in glioblastoma, whereas bevacizumab (BEV) is increasingly used as a steroid-sparing alternative. Although both reduce edema, their broader immunometabolic effects remain ill-defined. Here, we examine how DEXA and BEV differentially affect tumor metabolism and microenvironment in patient samples and experimental models. Methods We integrated 1H-NMR–based metabolomics of human glioblastoma specimens with mechanistic in vitro studies to compare DEXA and BEV. Microenvironmental modulation by DEXA vs BEV was further investigated in vivo in a syngeneic, immunocompetent orthotopic glioma mouse model by flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry, followed by ex vivo co-culture models. Results Tumors from DEXA-treated patients (n = 12) vs steroid-naive controls (n = 18) showed nine significantly altered metabolites, including increased lactate, cystathionine, and 2-hydroxybutyrate, indicating a metabolically accelerated, proliferation-associated state. In an immunocompetent orthotopic glioma model, DEXA reduced intratumoral T cell infiltration and induced cytokine conditions favoring regulatory T cells and myeloid recruitment. In contrast, BEV elicited a coordinated immunostimulatory phenotype: it increased chemotactic cytokines in vitro (e.g. CCL5), decreased intratumoral regulatory T cells (CD4+FOXP3+), enhanced activated, Granzyme B (GzmB) expressing effector T cells (CD4+GzmB+) in vivo, and improved spleenocyte-mediated tumor cell killing ex vivo. Conclusions Together, DEXA promotes an immunosuppressive, metabolically active tumor microenvironment, whereas BEV supports immune infiltration and activation. These data, combining tissue-derived metabolomics with functional and mechanistic studies in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo, reveal fundamentally divergent immunometabolic effects of anti-edematous therapies with direct implications in clinical practice, particularly alongside immunotherapy in glioblastoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maise et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: