Compares forecasting methods for predicting GDP and unemployment in the USA, indicating an optimal approach for effective planning.
This paper contributes to the stream of literature on extreme event modelling and forecasting by comparing various forecasting methods for predicting extreme movements in GDP and unemployment in the United States. The data were obtained from multiple open sources for the USA, including CNBC, the U.S. National Library of Medicine, the National Institutes of Health, the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, the Bureau of Transportation Statistics site, Investing Com, the U.S. Bureau of Labour Statistics, Yahoo Finance, The Balance and Wikipedia. The research focuses on identifying the optimal forecasting method between Machine Learning and time-series forecasting algorithms, for predicting extreme values of GDP and unemployment, accounting for natural disasters and industrial and economic factors. The statistical and analytical insights derived from this study, if used judiciously, can inform policymaking and planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shankar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: