Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis examines climate resilience hubs' role in promoting local climate actions in marginalized urban areas.
Cities constitute sites of climate vulnerability, especially marginalised urban locations like informal settlements. Yet there appears to be an inverse connection between climate vulnerability and governing responsibility. Marginalised urban settlements remain excluded from decisions and subsequently responses that inform and define climate adaptation agendas. This article deploys literature on multi-scalar governance and an adaptive governance framing as theoretical scaffolding to build a case for climate resilience hubs as alternative innovative climate change governance platforms. The article shifts focus from the frequently studied large cities to consider climate resilience hubs from two secondary cities, Bulawayo and Kariba, in Zimbabwe, where climate resilience hubs have been implemented by Slum Dwellers International (SDI) affiliates. The study deploys a qualitative approach and makes two broad arguments. Climate resilience hubs constitute innovative and adaptive governance spaces that facilitate bottom-up engagements with both state and non-state actors, creating the scope for informing and influencing locally led climate actions. Pre-existing social infrastructure associated with SDI processes and practices provides critical institutional machinery for driving climate resilience hubs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
George Masimba (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: