Evaluates a new calibration pipeline for precipitation data, enhancing hydrological modelling accuracy in the Volga region.
Spaceborne precipitation products such as NASA IMERG V07 provide sub-hourly data required for hydrological modelling, but systematic biases in wet-event frequency and extreme-intensity representation limit their reliability for applications sensitive to precipitation extremes. This study develops a three-stage calibration pipeline combining probability-of-precipitation frequency adaptation, empirical quantile mapping of the distribution body, and Generalised Pareto Distribution tail modelling with constrained blending. The approach is calibrated against 202 Roshydromet stations using 3-hourly observations and evaluated on 15 spatially independent stations over a 9-year validation period. At the station-optimal blending weight, the proposed pipeline reduces median absolute percentage bias at the P99 quantile from 43.9% to 10.2%, while maintaining comparable volume balance (|PBIAS| 6.5%). To suppress a disaggregation artefact arising from amplification of multi-hour accumulations, the operational gridded R-factor product instead adopts a more conservative blend (|PBIAS@P99| = 24.9%) together with an empirically constrained accumulation cap, although the absence of sub-hourly calibration data remains the principal limitation. The calibrated dataset is applied to derive a 24-year (2001–2024) rainfall erosivity climatology for the Volga region, yielding a domain-mean R-factor of 254 ± 55 MJ mm ha−1 h−1 yr−1 with no detectable monotonic trend. The proposed framework improves the representation of precipitation extremes and provides a transferable preprocessing approach for hydrological modelling applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Artur Gafurov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: