Evaluates inter-printhead bonding strategies' effect on tensile strength in 3D printing, suggesting viable methods for improved performance.
Collective additive manufacturing (CoAM) distributes a single part across multiple coordinated printheads to reduce makespan and enable larger build volumes. While prior work has focused on scheduling and partitioning strategies, the mechanical implications of inter-printhead bonding remain underexplored. This study proposes and evaluates six inter-printhead bonding strategies. Overlap, Finger joint, Ironing, Interlock, Interlace, and Stochastic against two baselines (Inline and 30° Chunk) using PLA tensile specimens. Compared to a part printed using a single printhead, results showed relative ultimate tensile strength of Interlace (92.5%), Ironing (90.4%), Chunk (89.2%), Stochastic (89.0%), and Inline (87.8%), forming a top-performing group with minimal strength differences. Stochastic and Chunk exhibited markedly higher elongation, 6.43% and 8.98% at break respectively, compared to other methods. The findings demonstrate multiple viable bonding strategies for CoAM and highlight the bidirectional dependence between process planning and bonding design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taiwo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: