Evaluates effects of bioactive nanohybrid materials on therapeutic resistance in tumors, indicating novel treatment potential.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Tumor resistance is increasingly recognized as a systems-level phenomenon emerging from the collective behavior of the tumor ecosystem rather than solely from cancer cell–intrinsic genetic alterations. Here, we define the oncobiosphere as a functionally integrated, multiscale system that extends beyond the tumor ecosystem by incorporating not only cellular and molecular interactions but also extracellular matrix (ECM)-driven biophysical constraints and transport dynamics that shape therapeutic accessibility. Within this environment, reciprocal biochemical and biomechanical interactions promote pro-survival signaling, immune exclusion, and physical barriers that restrict therapeutic access, giving rise to pseudoresistance despite the absence of classical resistance mutations. Key signaling axes including integrin–FAK, TGF-β, YAP/TAZ, STAT3, and Wnt/β-catenin converge to reinforce ECM remodeling, desmoplasia, and impaired drug penetration. These pathways stabilize a protective microenvironment through extrinsic feedback loops rather than intrinsic tumor adaptation. In this context, nanobiotechnology offers new opportunities to modulate stromal dynamics. Nanoengineered agents, such as nanoniclosamide (nano-NIC), and ECM-targeting delivery systems may disrupt pathological matrix remodeling and restore tissue permissiveness. By reprogramming the oncobiosphere, therapeutic resistance can be viewed as a reversible ecological state, opening avenues for more durable anticancer responses across treatment modalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rejinold et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: