Proposes a workforce-management model in public hospitals, suggesting new staffing norms.
Public hospital systems face simultaneous shortage and surplus of clinical staff within the same national network, yet lack instruments that combine cross-institutional comparison with a normative establishment recommendation. This paper describes a dual-objective workforce-management model that separates a redistribution proposal from a normative establishment recommendation. The method processes monthly-to-quarterly data per (specialty × progressivity × institution × occupational group) stratum in five stages. Stages A–D produce a lossless sectoral redistribution of filled FTE via peer-group-internal benchmark comparators, a priority matrix, a two-branch complexity weight (active-care: CMI × case count; chronic-care: weighted chronic nursing days), and a correction coefficient with policy-stability guards. Stage E constructs the normative establishment: a nationally weighted collective norm with its operational-staffing-requirement (OSR) denominator re-expressed in equity-weighted units yields established and modified frames between a filled-post floor and an OSR ceiling. Adoption requires three infrastructural preconditions: a unified activity-and-case-mix data source, a central post-level payroll register, and standardised institutional strata. A five-month 2025 case study on inpatient gastroenterology (progressivity II.b) across 19 Hungarian public-network hospitals illustrates the pipeline: redistribution cuts the load-ratio Gini on this stratum from 0.28 to 0.06, while the normative stage delivers actionable diagnostics for governmental decisions. The system is in introduction phase: the model makes embedded staffing knowledge explicit, auditable and contestable; system-level effects are not yet evaluated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balogh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: