Key result
Positive 18F-FDG PET/CT linked to ~170% higher risk of major cardiac events in PVE.
Why the study?
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT predict major cardiac events in patients with definite left-sided infective endocarditis?
Cohort (n=173)
Does 18F-FDG PET/CT predict major cardiac events in patients with definite left-sided infective endocarditis?
Hazard Ratio: 2.7 (95% CI 1.1–6.7)
p-value: p=0.04
18F-FDG PET/CT has significant prognostic value for predicting major cardiac events in prosthetic valve endocarditis and new embolic events in both native and prosthetic valve endocarditis.
BACKGROUND 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) is commonly used for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE), but its prognostic value remains unknown. OBJECTIVES This study sought to assess the prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) and native valve endocarditis (NVE). METHODS This study prospectively included 173 consecutive patients (109 PVE and 64 NVE) with definite left-sided IE who had an 18F-FDG PET/CT and were followed-up for 1 year. The primary endpoint was a composite of major cardiac events: death, recurrence of IE, acute cardiac failure, nonscheduled hospitalization for cardiovascular indication, and new embolic event. RESULTS 18F-FDG PET/CT was positive in 100 (58%) patients, 83% (n = 90 of 109) in the PVE, and 16% (n = 10 of 64) in the NVE group. At a mean follow-up of 225 days (interquartile range: 199 to 251 days), the primary endpoint occurred in 94 (54%) patients: 63 (58%) in the PVE group and 31 (48%) in the NVE group. In the PVE group, positive 18F-FDG PET/CT was significantly associated with a higher rate of primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 6.7; p = 0.04). Moderate to intense 18F-FDG valvular uptake was also associated with worse outcome (HR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.3 to 4.5; p = 0.03) and to new embolic events in PVE (HR: 7.5; 95% CI: 1.24 to 45.2; p = 0.03) and in NVE (HR: 8.8; 95% CI: 1.1 to 69.5; p = 0.02). In the NVE group, 18F-FDG PET/CT was not associated with occurrence of the primary endpoint CONCLUSIONS: In addition to its good diagnostic performance, 18F-FDG PET/CT is predictive of major cardiac events in PVE and new embolic events within the first year following IE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
San et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Infective endocarditis (n=173). Positive 18F-FDG PET/CT vs. Negative 18F-FDG PET/CT was evaluated on Composite of major cardiac events: death, recurrence of IE, acute cardiac failure, nonscheduled hospitalization for cardiovascular indication, and new embolic event (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1-6.7, p=0.04). Positive 18F-FDG PET/CT was significantly associated with a higher rate of major cardiac events in patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.7; p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: