Key result
Peak E wave velocity over 1.2 m/s identifies severe MR with high sensitivity and specificity.
Why the study?
Mitral regurgitation is a common echocardiographic finding lacking a simple, accurate quantification method, prompting the evaluation of peak mitral inflow velocity as an easily measured screening variable.
Does peak E wave velocity accurately predict mitral regurgitation severity in patients with varying grades of MR?
Observational (n=102)
No
Does peak E wave velocity accurately predict mitral regurgitation severity in patients with varying grades of MR?
Peak E wave velocity >1.2 m/s serves as a simple, easily obtainable echocardiographic screening tool to identify severe mitral regurgitation.
May support peak E wave velocity for MR screening; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
OBJECTIVES: Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common echocardiographic finding; however, there is no simple accurate method for quantification. The aim of this study was to develop an easily measured screening variable for hemodynamically significant MR. BACKGROUND: The added regurgitant volume in MR increases the left atrial to left ventricular gradient, which then increases the peak mitral inflow or the peak E wave velocity. Our hypothesis was that peak E wave velocity and the E/A ratio increase in proportion to MR severity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 102 consecutive patients with varying grades of MR seen in the Adult Echocardiography Laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco. Peak E wave velocity, peak A wave velocity, E/A ratio and E wave deceleration time were measured in all patients. The reference standard for MR was qualitative echocardiographic evaluation by an expert and quantitation of regurgitant fraction using two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. RESULTS: Peak E wave velocity was seen to increase in proportion to MR severity, with a significant difference between the different groups (F = 37, p < 0.0001). Peak E wave velocity correlated with regurgitant fraction (r = 0.52, p < 0.001). Furthermore, an E wave velocity >1.2 m/s identified 24 of 27 patients with severe MR (sensitivity 86%, specificity 86%, positive predictive value 75%). An A wave dominant pattern excluded the presence of severe MR. The E/A ratio also increased in proportion to MR severity. Peak A wave velocity and E wave deceleration time showed no correlation with MR severity. CONCLUSIONS: Peak E wave velocity is easy to obtain and is therefore widely applicable in clinical practice as a screening tool for evaluating MR severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thomas et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Mitral regurgitation (n=102). Peak E wave velocity was evaluated on Correlation with regurgitant fraction and identification of severe mitral regurgitation (r = 0.52, p=<0.001). Peak E wave velocity >1.2 m/s identified severe mitral regurgitation with 86% sensitivity and 86% specificity, and correlated with regurgitant fraction (r=0.52, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: