PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 12, 2026Journal of the American College of Cardiology165 citations

Ascending Aortic Length and Risk of Aortic Adverse Events

View Full Paper
JWJinlin WuMZMohammad A. ZafarYLYupeng Li

Key Points

  • This study aims to understand the changes in ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm risk based on ascending aortic length.
  • Evaluated ascending aortic diameters and lengths in 522 ATAA patients.
  • Analyzed long-term aortic adverse events using statistical methods.
  • Developed predictive tools including the aortic height index for risk stratification.
  • An AAL of ≥13 cm correlated with a 5-fold increase in average yearly AAEs versus AAL <9 cm.
  • Identified two 'hinge points' for increased AAEs risk between 11.5-12.0 cm and 12.5-13.0 cm.
  • Introduced aortic height index significantly improved model discrimination (AUC 0.810) for predicting AAEs.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Little information is available regarding the longitudinal changes of the aneurysmal ascending aorta. OBJECTIVES This study sought to outline the natural history of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) based on ascending aortic length (AAL) and develop novel predictive tools to better aid risk stratification. METHODS The ascending aortic diameters and lengths, and long-term aortic adverse events (AAEs) (rupture, dissection, and death) of 522 ATAA patients were evaluated using comprehensive statistical approaches. RESULTS An AAL of ≥13 cm was associated with an almost 5-fold higher average yearly rate of AAEs compared with an AAL of <9 cm. Two AAL "hinge points" with a sharp increase in the estimated probability of AAEs were detected between 11.5 and 12.0 cm, and between 12.5 and 13.0 cm. The mean estimated annual aortic elongation rate was 0.18 cm/year, and aortic elongation was age dependent. Aortic diameter increased 18% due to dissection while AAL only increased by 2.7%. There was a noticeable improvement in the discrimination of the logistic regression model (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve: 0.810) due to the introduction of aortic height index (AHI) (diameter height index + length height index). The AHIs <9.33, 9.38 to 10.81, 10.86 to 12.50, and ≥12.57 cm/m were associated with a ∼4%, ∼7%, ∼12%, and ∼18% average yearly risk of AAEs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS An aortic elongation of 11 cm serves as a potential intervention criterion for ATAA, which is even more reliable than diameter due to its relative immunity to dissection. AHI (including both length and diameter) is more powerful than any single parameter in this study.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wu et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2b7ab03b30671ceba45054https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.078
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Height alone, rather than body surface area, suffices for risk estimation in ascending aortic aneurysm2017 · 283 citations
  2. 2What is the appropriate size criterion for resection of thoracic aortic aneurysms?1997 · 617 citations
  3. 3Multifactorial Relationship Between 18 F-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography Signaling and Biomechanical Properties in Unruptured Aortic Aneurysms2013 · 65 citations
  4. 4Advances in determining abdominal aortic aneurysm size and growth2016 · 32 citations
  5. 5Elastin and collagen fibre microstructure of the human aorta in ageing and disease: a review2013 · 503 citations