Evaluates defect detection in steel-PIR sandwich panels, suggesting effective quality control methods.
Lightweight steel-polyisocyanurate (PIR) foam sandwich panels are used in industrial construction of buildings, since they are inexpensive, easy to build, and have good insulation. However, yellow air voids or delaminations at or close to the steel-foam interface that form during production can negatively impact their structural properties. Detecting such defects in-process non-destructively during the production remains a challenge. This work uses air-coupled ultrasound for the in-line defect detection in steel-PIR sandwich panels, by exciting and receiving guided Lamb waves propagating in the steel face sheet to identify local amplitude changes caused by yellow air voids or delaminations close to the steel-foam interface. Two systems are investigated: First, a laboratory prototype employing a transmission phased array together with a laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV) for reception at 40 kHz for comparison with previous work, and second, an industrial prototype better optimized for the production environment using air-coupled ultrasonic transducers for reception at 216 kHz. In total 49 production-inserted artificial test defects are evaluated for testing these systems. With the laboratory prototype as reference system employing the LDV, all tested artificial air void defects are detected by an approx. 25% amplitude change at the defect locations. The industrial prototype with the ultrasonic transducer for reception detected an amplitude increase of 10% to 40% at most of the test defects. When using a conservative 4 σ threshold, 63% of yellow test defects are detected with no false positives during the measurement time. yellow These results show that air-coupled ultrasound has potential for non-destructive detection of foam defects under real production conditions, while the present industrial prototype still requires further development before deployment as a stand-alone quality-control system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haugwitz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: